Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 15 results ...

Abdollahipour, S, Jeong, D H S, Burman, R R and Gunsaulis, F (2012) Performance Assessment of On-Grade Horizontal Directional Drilling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 458–68.

Anastasopoulos, P C, Labi, S, Bhargava, A and Mannering, F L (2012) Empirical Assessment of the Likelihood and Duration of Highway Project Time Delays. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 390–8.

Becerik-Gerber, B, Jazizadeh, F, Li, N and Calis, G (2012) Application Areas and Data Requirements for BIM-Enabled Facilities Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 431–42.

Chi, S and Caldas, C H (2012) Image-Based Safety Assessment: Automated Spatial Safety Risk Identification of Earthmoving and Surface Mining Activities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 341–51.

Choi, K, Kwak, Y H, Pyeon, J and Son, K (2012) Schedule Effectiveness of Alternative Contracting Strategies for Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 323–30.

Hanna, A S (2012) Using the Earned Value Management System to Improve Electrical Project Control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 449–57.

Jain, K K and Bhattacharjee, B (2012) Application of Fuzzy Concepts to the Visual Assessment of Deteriorating Reinforced Concrete Structures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 399–408.

Kim, B, Lim, H, Kim, H and Hong, T (2012) Determining the Value of Governmental Subsidies for the Installation of Clean Energy Systems Using Real Options. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 422–30.

Lee, D, Lim, T and Arditi, D (2012) Stochastic Project Financing Analysis System for Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 376–89.

Lim, B T H, Ling, F Y Y, Ibbs, C W, Raphael, B and Ofori, G (2012) Mathematical Models for Predicting Organizational Flexibility of Construction Firms in Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 361–75.

Love, P E D, Edwards, D J, Irani, Z and Sharif, A (2012) Participatory Action Research Approach to Public Sector Procurement Selection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 311–22.

Subramanyan, H, Sawant, P H and Bhatt, V (2012) Construction Project Risk Assessment: Development of Model Based on Investigation of Opinion of Construction Project Experts from India. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 409–21.

Tan, Y, Shen, L and Langston, C (2012) Competition Environment, Strategy, and Performance in the Hong Kong Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 352–60.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Contractors; Competition; Resource management; Construction industry; Hong Kong; Contractor; Competitive strategy; Competition environment; Resources and capability; Performance;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000407
  • Abstract:
    Given a changing competition environment, strategic management has become of essential importance to construction firms. Effective strategy enables construction firms to match their activities to the changing environment and achieve superior performance in competition. Therefore, there is a need for studying contractors’ competitive strategies. This paper does that in relation to the Hong Kong construction industry. The impact of competition environment on contractor performance, and the relationship between competitive strategy and performance are examined by a questionnaire survey. The findings show that competition environment has a great impact on contractor performance, and four generic competitive strategies have been applied by contractors. Contractors can indeed be classified into four groups according to their different strategic orientations: prospectors, analyzers, defenders, and reactors. As a result, the strategies that contractors should pursue in the local construction industry can be identified with confidence.

Townsend, K, Lingard, H, Bradley, L and Brown, K (2012) Complicated Working Time Arrangements: Construction Industry Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 443–8.

Yiu, T W, Cheung, S O and Siu, L Y (2012) Application of Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory to Examining the Choice of Tactics in Construction Dispute Negotiation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(03), 331–40.